[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAN1soZxf=i9Z9zOpbE2zUW6q6CY9TfOsUB7bf+-K_oLcmFqeCQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 12:43:02 +0800
From: Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@...il.com>
To: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>
Cc: Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
John Stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, Stephen Warren <swarren@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 11/11] ARM: delete struct sys_timer
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 2:31 AM, Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org> wrote:
> From: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dia.com>
>
> Now that the only field in struct sys_timer is .init, delete the struct,
> and replace the machine descriptor .timer field with the initialization
> function itself.
>
> This will enable moving timer drivers into drivers/clocksource without
> having to place a public prototype of each struct sys_timer object into
> include/linux; the intent is to create a single of_clocksource_init()
> function that determines which timer driver to initialize by scanning
> the device dtree, much like the proposed irqchip_init() at:
> http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg203686.html
>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dia.com>
> Tested-by: Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@...e.fr>
> ---
> v3: Minor merge conflicts due to rebasing onto next-20121115.
> v2: Converted all platforms, not just Tegra.
>
> The patch is very large, so I've trimmed it for the mailing list, leaving
> only the core ARM changes, changes outside arch/arm, and a single machine
> example. The full series can be found at:
>
> git://nv-tegra.nvidia.com/user/swarren/linux-2.6 arm_timer_rework
> ---
> 492 files changed, 622 insertions(+), 1199 deletions(-)
I checked the patch for mach-mmp.
@@ -69,7 +65,7 @@ static const char *mmp_dt_board_compat[] __initdata = {
DT_MACHINE_START(PXA168_DT, "Marvell PXA168 (Device Tree Support)")
.map_io = mmp_map_io,
.init_irq = mmp_dt_irq_init,
- .timer = &mmp_dt_timer,
+ .init_time = mmp_dt_init_timer,
.init_machine = pxa168_dt_init,
.dt_compat = mmp_dt_board_compat,
MACHINE_END
@@ -77,7 +73,7 @@ MACHINE_END
DT_MACHINE_START(PXA910_DT, "Marvell PXA910 (Device Tree Support)")
.map_io = mmp_map_io,
.init_irq = mmp_dt_irq_init,
- .timer = &mmp_dt_timer,
+ .init_time = mmp_dt_timer_init,
.init_machine = pxa910_dt_init,
.dt_compat = mmp_dt_board_compat,
MACHINE_END
This first init_time is assigned by mmp_dt_init_timer. But the second
init_time is
assigned by mmp_dt_timer_init. I think it's a typo error. Could you
help to fix this?
Regards
Haojian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists