[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAE9FiQXibjTQOGL9a1EJD=nCe4AjbF0kqOaOSXi3tm4u0zF26Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2012 16:34:33 -0800
From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 03/13] x86: Add macro for 64bit entry startup_64
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 4:32 PM, Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 4:28 PM, H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com> wrote:
>> On 11/20/2012 04:20 PM, Yinghai Lu wrote:
>>>
>>>> relocatable_kernel really should have been a flag, but it is now defined as
>>>> a comparison with zero. As such, and in an effort to minimize the growth of
>>>> struct setup_header (it is limited to little over 128 bytes long) I suggest
>>>> we redefine the 16-byte field at offset 0x236 as a new flags field. We
>>>> still only need one flag, though.
>
> ok will use 0x236.
how to call it?
boot_flag2 ?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists