[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201211210953.20552.arnd@arndb.de>
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 09:53:20 +0000
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>
Cc: John Stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
Josh Cartwright <josh.cartwright@...il.com>,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org, Stephen Warren <swarren@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 1/3] of: introduce for_each_matching_node_and_match()
On Tuesday 20 November 2012, Stephen Warren wrote:
> However, this results in iterating over table twice; the second time
> inside of_match_node(). The implementation of for_each_matching_node()
> already found the match, so this is redundant. Invent new function
> of_find_matching_node_and_match() and macro
> for_each_matching_node_and_match() to remove the double iteration,
> thus transforming the above code to:
>
> for_each_matching_node_and_match(np, table, &match)
>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dia.com>
This look useful, but I wonder if the interface would make more sense if you
make the last argument to the macro a normal pointer, rather than a
pointer-to-pointer. You can take the reference as part of the macro.
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists