linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL v2] at91: fixes for 3.7-rc7

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <50ACBA36.4030101@atmel.com>
Date:	Wed, 21 Nov 2012 12:25:42 +0100
From:	Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>
To:	Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>
CC:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Linux Kernel list" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@...el.com>,
	Chris Ball <cjb@...top.org>,
	"Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD" <plagnioj@...osoft.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL v2] at91: fixes for 3.7-rc7

On 11/21/2012 08:03 AM, Olof Johansson :
> Hi,
> 
> 
> On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 09:59:27AM +0100, Nicolas Ferre wrote:
>> Arnd, Olof,
>>
>> Just for the record, I do not want to put pressure at a such late time in
>> the 3.7-rc process. So, I just reworked that pull-request because the previous
>> one was wrong:
>> - wrong patch content (DT nodes with wrong size)
>> - not all tags in patches (Jean-Christophe and Arnd tags were missing...)
>>
>> Just to start from a sane base if I have to rebase this work for 3.8, I let you know
>> that I have updated this tag...
>>
>> The following changes since commit 641f3ce64b050961d454a0716bb6dbf528315aac:
>>
>>   ARM: at91/usbh: fix overcurrent gpio setup (2012-11-16 10:46:29 +0100)
>>
>> are available in the git repository at:
>>
>>   git://github.com/at91linux/linux-at91.git tags/at91-fixes
> 
> The new patches seem to belong in an at91/dt branch, not in a fixes one.
> 
> I can pull in the previous fixes branch as an at91/fixes-non-critical for 3.8
> if you want. There's no need to rebase them for this, is there? What is the
> pinctrl dependency that you are talking about, are some of these patches needed
> as prerequisites for pinctrl changes or the other way around?
> 
> Sorry if I've missed more elaborate emails on this and are asking repeat
> questions. ;)

No worries Olof, I might have been more precise in the subject of my
email: I have made up my mind and consider this material for 3.8.

As for the relation with pinctrl, we have made big modification to the
layout of some dtsi/dts there and it would make everyones' life easier
if we queue these dt/mmc changes on top of the current pinctrl tree...
Moreover, Jean-Christophe plans to add the pinctrl part of these
additions on top of the modification present in this pull-request: one
more reason to queue them in pinctrl git tree.

So, in brief: forget this pull-request (and the one that it replaces
obviously).

Thanks, bye,
-- 
Nicolas Ferre
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/