| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20121121165258.GD18738@sortiz-mobl> Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 17:52:58 +0100 From: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com> To: Inderpal Singh <inderpal.singh@...aro.org>, Sangbeom Kim <sbkim73@...sung.com> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, patches@...aro.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] MFD: SEC: Fix reg_offset for interrupt registers Hi Inderpal, On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 11:48:55AM +0530, Inderpal Singh wrote: > reg_offset is offset of the status/mask registers. Now, since status_base > and mask_base are pointing to corresponding first registers, reg_offset > should start from 0 otheriwse regmap_add_irq_chip will fail during probe. > > Signed-off-by: Inderpal Singh <inderpal.singh@...aro.org> > --- > It is based on Samuel's for-next-merge branch of mfd-2.6 tree. > > drivers/mfd/sec-irq.c | 102 ++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------- > 1 file changed, 51 insertions(+), 51 deletions(-) I queued this one to my for-linus branch since it basically prevents IRQs from working here. But it seems weird that such a mistake was not caught earlier. So I'd like to get Sangbeom's ACK before pushing this one upstream. Cheers, Samuel. -- Intel Open Source Technology Centre http://oss.intel.com/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists