[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20121121172011.GI8218@suse.de>
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 17:20:11 +0000
From: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>,
Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@...com>,
Alex Shi <lkml.alex@...il.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/46] Automatic NUMA Balancing V4
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 06:03:06PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 10:21:06AM +0000, Mel Gorman wrote:
> > >
> > > I am not including a benchmark report in this but will be posting one
> > > shortly in the "Latest numa/core release, v16" thread along with the latest
> > > schednuma figures I have available.
> > >
> >
> > Report is linked here https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/11/21/202
> >
> > I ended up cancelling the remaining tests and restarted with
> >
> > 1. schednuma + patches posted since so that works out as
>
> Mel, I'd like to ask you to refer to our tree as numa/core or
> 'numacore' in the future. Would such a courtesy to use the
> current name of our tree be possible?
>
Sure, no problem.
> (We dropped sched/numa long ago and that you still keep
> referring to it is rather confusing to me.)
>
Understood.
--
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists