[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20121121174655.GA25392@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 12:46:55 -0500
From: Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>
To: Darren Hart <dvhart@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: pi futex oops in __lock_acquire
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 09:37:40AM -0800, Darren Hart wrote:
> I've sent a patch to address this. It has now been running "trinity -c
> futex" for about 12 hours. I haven't seen any more futex failures
Looks good here too.
> but I
> have seen a few OOMs. Is that expected from trinity?
Yeah, seems there's some leaks (both in trinity and the kernel).
Oddly enough someone else emailed me about that this morning, which
prompted me to write up this: http://codemonkey.org.uk/2012/11/21/fuzz-testing-oom-killer/
Which is just part of the problem. There are other issues too it seems. Fun.
Dave
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists