[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20121121181430.GE6406@obsidianresearch.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 11:14:30 -0700
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@...idianresearch.com>
To: Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
devicetree-discuss <devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] of: Have of_device_add call platform_device_add rather
than device_add
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 06:07:46PM +0000, Grant Likely wrote:
> > Which is nesting the generic gpio driver under a larger region..
>
> Try two sibling nodes with overlapping addresses. There are powerpc
> device trees doing that even though it isn't legal by the ofw and
> epapr specs.
Both my examples were using sibling nodes in the OF tree.
pex@...00000 {
device_type = "pci";
ranges = <0x02000000 0x00000000 0x00000000 0xe0000000 0x0 0x8000000>;
bus-range = <0x0 0xFF>;
chip@0 {
ranges = <0x02000000 0x00000000 0x00000000 0x02000000 0x00000000 0x00000000 0x0 0x8000000>;
chip_control@0 {
compatible = "orc,chip,control";
assigned-addresses = <0x02000000 0x0 0x0 0x0 4096>;
};
gpio3: chip_gpio@8 {
#gpio-cells = <2>;
compatible = "linux,basic-mmio-gpio";
gpio-controller;
reg-names = "dat", "set", "dirin";
assigned-addresses = <0x02000000 0x0 0x8 0x0 4>,
<0x02000000 0x0 0xc 0x0 4>,
<0x02000000 0x0 0x10 0x0 4>;
};
Non-conformant yes, but it is the simplest way to get linux to bind
two drivers to the same memory space.
Jason
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists