[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20121121183403.GA7657@kroah.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 10:34:03 -0800
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@...idianresearch.com>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] of: use platform_device_add
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 06:15:59PM +0000, Grant Likely wrote:
> This allows platform_device_add a chance to call insert_resource on all
> of the resources from OF. At a minimum this fills in proc/iomem and
> presumably makes resource tracking and conflict detection work better.
> However, it has the side effect of moving all OF generated platform
> devices from /sys/devices to /sys/devices/platform/. It /shouldn't/
> break userspace because userspace is not supposed to depend on the full
> path (because userspace always does what it is supposed to, right?).
>
> It also has a backup call to of_device_add() when running on PowerPC to
> catch any devices that have overlapping regions. It will complain about
> them, but it will not fail to register the device.
>
> Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@...idianresearch.com>
> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
> Cc: Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>
> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
> Signed-off-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>
> ---
>
> Greg, do you mind taking a look at this? The reason the OF code hasn't been
> calling platform_device_add() directly to this point is:
> a) there are some trees with resource overlays
> b) I want the devices in /sys/devices not /sys/devices/platform.
Putting the devices all in the "flat" location of /sys/devices/ is a bit
worrisome to me. What's wrong with platform/ ? That is what they are,
right? Why change this?
> I could easily add exceptions to platform_device_add() for both those cases, but
> I don't like adding DT exceptions to the common code. However, I still need to
> support the platforms that unfortunately have overlapping resources. This patch
> does that by still calling the old path if platform_device_add() fails, but it
> isn't nice either because of_device_add() has to duplicate
> platform_device_add(). Blech. Plus the exception only applies for PowerPC.
>
> So, how do you feel about having a 'relaxed' mode for platform_device_add()
> which means it won't fail if resources overlap and maybe won't do the silly
> platform_bus parent thing. Thoughts?
I have no objection for the resource issue, if you assure me it will not
be abused :)
But the sysfs location is still an issue, sorry.
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists