[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20121121113920.0f0672b1.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 11:39:20 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Anton Vorontsov <anton.vorontsov@...aro.org>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
Leonid Moiseichuk <leonid.moiseichuk@...ia.com>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...il.com>,
Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>,
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>,
John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org,
patches@...aro.org, kernel-team@...roid.com,
linux-man@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 3/3] man-pages: Add man page for vmpressure_fd(2)
On Wed, 21 Nov 2012 15:01:50 +0000
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 10:12:28AM -0800, David Rientjes wrote:
> > On Mon, 19 Nov 2012, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
> >
> > > We try to make userland freeing resources when the system becomes low on
> > > memory. Once we're short on memory, sometimes it's better to discard
> > > (free) data, rather than let the kernel to drain file caches or even start
> > > swapping.
> > >
> >
> > To add another usecase: its possible to modify our version of malloc (or
> > any malloc) so that memory that is free()'d can be released back to the
> > kernel only when necessary, i.e. when keeping the extra memory around
> > starts to have a detremental effect on the system, memcg, or cpuset. When
> > there is an abundance of memory available such that allocations need not
> > defragment or reclaim memory to be allocated, it can improve performance
> > to keep a memory arena from which to allocate from immediately without
> > calling the kernel.
> >
>
> A potential third use case is a variation of the first for batch systems. If
> it's running low priority tasks and a high priority task starts that
> results in memory pressure then the job scheduler may decide to move the
> low priority jobs elsewhere (or cancel them entirely).
>
> A similar use case is monitoring systems running high priority workloads
> that should never swap. It can be easily detected if the system starts
> swapping but a pressure notification might act as an early warning system
> that something is happening on the system that might cause the primary
> workload to start swapping.
I hope Anton's writing all of this down ;)
The proposed API bugs me a bit. It seems simplistic. I need to have a
quality think about this. Maybe the result of that think will be to
suggest an interface which can be extended in a back-compatible fashion
later on, if/when the simplistic nature becomes a problem.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists