[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20121121195114.GM2822@localhost>
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 11:51:15 -0800
From: Joel Becker <jlbec@...lplan.org>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
Linux Containers <containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>,
Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@...e.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 09/12] userns: Convert ocfs2 to use kuid and kgid
where appropriate
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 04:43:37AM -0800, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> --- a/fs/ocfs2/file.c
> +++ b/fs/ocfs2/file.c
> @@ -1116,7 +1116,8 @@ int ocfs2_setattr(struct dentry *dentry, struct iattr *attr)
> (unsigned long long)OCFS2_I(inode)->ip_blkno,
> dentry->d_name.len, dentry->d_name.name,
> attr->ia_valid, attr->ia_mode,
> - attr->ia_uid, attr->ia_gid);
> + from_kuid(&init_user_ns, attr->ia_uid),
> + from_kgid(&init_user_ns, attr->ia_gid));
Dear Eric,
I have a similar question about init_user_ns to Dave. As far as
I can tell, using init_user_ns here means we'll never get translations
based on the current process namespace. It just so happens that
include/linux/user_namespace.h doesn't allow new namespaces yet, but I
can't see why we would propagate that knowledge elsewhere.
Is there some magic about when init_user_ns should be used
regardless?
Joel
--
Brain: I shall pollute the water supply with this DNAdefibuliser,
turning everyone into mindless slaves.
Pinky: What about the people who drink bottled water?
Brain: Pinky, people who pay 5 dollars for a bottle of water are
already mindless slaves.
http://www.jlbec.org/
jlbec@...lplan.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists