[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20121122102710.GD4328@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2012 10:27:10 +0000
From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Cc: sameo@...ux.intel.com, devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, spear-devel@...t.st.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 1/2] mfd: stmpe: Use devm_*() routines
On Thu, 22 Nov 2012, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> This patch frees stmpe driver from tension of freeing resources :)
> devm_* derivatives of multiple routines are used while allocating resources,
> which would be freed automatically by kernel.
>
> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
> ---
>
> V1->V2:
> ------
> - Rebased over latest for-next from Samuel
> - updated additional kzalloc with devm_kzalloc(), first one seen below.
>
> drivers/mfd/stmpe.c | 60 +++++++++++++++++++----------------------------------
> 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/stmpe.c b/drivers/mfd/stmpe.c
> index ba157d4..c0df4b9 100644
> --- a/drivers/mfd/stmpe.c
> +++ b/drivers/mfd/stmpe.c
> @@ -1052,17 +1052,17 @@ int __devinit stmpe_probe(struct stmpe_client_info *ci, int partnum)
> int ret;
>
> if (!pdata) {
> - if (np) {
> - pdata = kzalloc(sizeof(*pdata), GFP_KERNEL);
> - if (!pdata)
> - return -ENOMEM;
> -
> - stmpe_of_probe(pdata, np);
> - } else
> + if (!np)
I'm assuming you've reversed the semantics here for >80 chars reasons?
I see no harm in it though.
Acked-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
--
Lee Jones
Linaro ST-Ericsson Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists