lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 21 Nov 2012 20:05:16 -0800
From:	Mike Turquette <mturquette@...com>
To:	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
CC:	Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] CLK: uninline clk_prepare() and clk_unprepare()

Quoting Viresh Kumar (2012-11-21 19:34:18)
> On 22 November 2012 02:13, Mike Turquette <mturquette@...com> wrote:
> > HAVE_CLK logically wraps HAVE_CLK_PREPARE.  There is no point in
> > selecting HAVE_CLK_PREPARE without HAVE_CLK.
> >
> > Looking through the code I see that this used to be the case.  Commit
> > 93abe8e "clk: add non CONFIG_HAVE_CLK routines" moved the
> > clk_(un)prepare declarations outside of #ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_CLK.  That
> > commit was authored by you.  Can you elaborate on why that aspect of the
> > patch was needed?
> 
> Haha... Caught red handed :(
> 
> Before this commit, nothing was enclosed within CONFIG_HAVE_CLK and
> this patch only introduced it. I am not really sure, why i kept
> prepare/unprepare
> out of it though :(
> 
> Maybe because some platform at that time is using it directly, without
> CONFIG_HAVE_CLK. Not sure.
> 

No worries.  Looks like everything gets sorted out in the end ;)

Regards,
Mike

> --
> viresh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ