[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20121122040516.21126.17028@nucleus>
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 20:05:16 -0800
From: Mike Turquette <mturquette@...com>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
CC: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] CLK: uninline clk_prepare() and clk_unprepare()
Quoting Viresh Kumar (2012-11-21 19:34:18)
> On 22 November 2012 02:13, Mike Turquette <mturquette@...com> wrote:
> > HAVE_CLK logically wraps HAVE_CLK_PREPARE. There is no point in
> > selecting HAVE_CLK_PREPARE without HAVE_CLK.
> >
> > Looking through the code I see that this used to be the case. Commit
> > 93abe8e "clk: add non CONFIG_HAVE_CLK routines" moved the
> > clk_(un)prepare declarations outside of #ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_CLK. That
> > commit was authored by you. Can you elaborate on why that aspect of the
> > patch was needed?
>
> Haha... Caught red handed :(
>
> Before this commit, nothing was enclosed within CONFIG_HAVE_CLK and
> this patch only introduced it. I am not really sure, why i kept
> prepare/unprepare
> out of it though :(
>
> Maybe because some platform at that time is using it directly, without
> CONFIG_HAVE_CLK. Not sure.
>
No worries. Looks like everything gets sorted out in the end ;)
Regards,
Mike
> --
> viresh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists