[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20121122154107.GB11736@localhost>
Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2012 23:41:07 +0800
From: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
To: Metin Döşlü <metindoslu@...il.com>
Cc: Jaegeuk Hanse <jaegeuk.hanse@...il.com>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>
Subject: Re: Problem in Page Cache Replacement
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 12:07:22PM +0200, Metin Döşlü wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 12:00 PM, Jaegeuk Hanse <jaegeuk.hanse@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> > On 11/21/2012 05:58 PM, metin d wrote:
> >
> > Hi Fengguang,
> >
> > I run tests and attached the results. The line below I guess shows the data-1 page caches.
> >
> > 0x000000080000006c 6584051 25718 __RU_lA___________________P________ referenced,uptodate,lru,active,private
> >
> >
> > I thinks this is just one state of page cache pages.
>
> But why these page caches are in this state as opposed to other page
> caches. From the results I conclude that:
>
> data-1 pages are in state : referenced,uptodate,lru,active,private
I wonder if it's this code that stops data-1 pages from being
reclaimed:
shrink_page_list():
if (page_has_private(page)) {
if (!try_to_release_page(page, sc->gfp_mask))
goto activate_locked;
What's the filesystem used?
> data-2 pages are in state : referenced,uptodate,lru,mappedtodisk
Thanks,
Fengguang
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists