[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20ADAB092842284E95860F279283C564452531@BGSMSX101.gar.corp.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2012 13:00:52 +0000
From: "Tc, Jenny" <jenny.tc@...el.com>
To: "myungjoo.ham@...sung.com" <myungjoo.ham@...sung.com>,
Anton Vorontsov <cbouatmailru@...il.com>,
"Anton Vorontsov (anton.vorontsov@...aro.org)"
<anton.vorontsov@...aro.org>
CC: ??? <cw00.choi@...sung.com>,
anish singh <anish198519851985@...il.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"myunjoo.ham@...il.com" <myunjoo.ham@...il.com>,
"lockwood@...roid.com" <lockwood@...roid.com>,
"peterhuewe@....de" <peterhuewe@....de>,
"broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com"
<broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
"gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"lars@...afoo.de" <lars@...afoo.de>,
"jic23@...nel.org" <jic23@...nel.org>,
"Pallala, Ramakrishna" <ramakrishna.pallala@...el.com>
Subject: RE: Re: [PATCH] extcon : callback function to read cable property
> The "RFC" patch for this feature is now shown at:
> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/mzx/extcon.git;a=commit;h=5655a
> eef83addaec77a3b9387a3dd18b6c146dd5
> (Note that "for-add-feature" branch is sort of "RFC" branch)
>
> I'm now considering relaying notifications of data updates possible via the
> notifier block of register-interest. Any inputs are welcomed.
>
>
> Anyway, for the USB issue of "suspend/resume at host-side and current-limit
> at device-side", we will need to 1. update regulator subsystem to have
> notification for current change (it does for enable/disable/voltage-changes)
> 2. let the charger use current-regulator 3. let the one who detects (usb
> driver?) changes at host-side change the current limit of that current-
> regulator 4. let the event from current-regulator relayed via extcon.
> We may use power-supply class as well for this issue. (may need to update if
> power-supply class does not have notifications and suspend/resume states)
>
For this solution to work, the cable provider itself
need to register with any of these subsystems - power_supply/regulator/charger manager
IMHO a cable provider shouldn't register itself with any of the subsystem.
For example it cannot register with power_supply subsystem
since it's not a power_supply. It's just source for a power_supply.
We register either charger/battery with power supply. I couldn't find a way
to register the cable with power supply subsystem.
Anton,
Do you have any suggestion here?
I think the same case with regulator framework also. A cable doesnĄ¯t belong
to a regulator framework. A cable doesnĄ¯t expose any control attribute (current control/voltage
control). It just have properties (eg current) controlled by external agents (Host machine/wall charger)
And charger manager is a consumer and not a provider. It cannot decide the charger cable capabilities.
I have a modified version of the above patch which uses properties directly.
https://gitorious.org/linux-charging-framework/linux-charging-framework/commit/ff358373dcb32027ebe1a267fc8b8999a3bd37e4
-jtc
Powered by blists - more mailing lists