[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <50ADAA26.7080103@ilyx.ru>
Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2012 08:29:26 +0400
From: Ilya Zykov <ilya@...x.ru>
To: andrew mcgregor <andrew.mcgregor@...iedtelesis.co.nz>
CC: Alan Cox <alan@...ux.intel.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tty: Add driver unthrottle in ioctl(...,TCFLSH,..).
On 22.11.2012 4:47, andrew mcgregor wrote:
>
>
>>>> On 11/22/2012 at 10:39 AM, in message <50AD4A01.7060500@...x.ru>, Ilya Zykov
> <ilya@...x.ru> wrote:
>> On 22.11.2012 1:30, Alan Cox wrote:
>>>> Function reset_buffer_flags() also invoked during the
>>>> ioctl(...,TCFLSH,..). At the time of request we can have full buffers
>>>> and throttled driver too. If we don't unthrottle driver, we can get
>>>> forever throttled driver, because after request, we will have
>>>> empty buffers and throttled driver and there is no place to unthrottle
>> driver.
>>>> It simple reproduce with "pty" pair then one side sleep on tty->write_wait,
>>>> and other side do ioctl(...,TCFLSH,..). Then there is no place to do
>> writers wake up.
>>>
>>>
>>> So instead of revertng it why not just fix it ? Just add an argument to
>>> the reset_buffer_flags function to indicate if unthrottling is permitted.
>>>
>>> Alan
>>>
>> Because in my opinion, unthrottling permitted always, except release
>> last filp (tty->count == 0)
>
> Maybe so, but the patch was there in the first place to resolve an actual observed bug, where a driver would lock up. So the behaviour needs preserved.
>
> Andrew
>
Maybe it was wrong driver, unfortunately, I didn't find full information
about this bug. As an example, if driver indirectly call
reset_buffer_flags() in driver's close() function it will be before
decrement last (tty->count).
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists