[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAC5umyibe0tb+HLxx3dbT7gF_nVAAHso1Y0Qb4Q_+y0KNrnvFg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2012 20:40:31 +0900
From: Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@...il.com>
To: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [POC] recoverable fault injection
2012/11/22 Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>:
> This idea has been floating around in my head for a long time now ...
>
> I was thinking: what if we could do fault injection during regular
> testing, at least on those code paths that are not supposed to have side
> effects when they fail? Now obviously this isn't all code paths, and
> many probably erroneously *do* have side effects even if they're not
> supposed to, but it does apply to a number of code paths.
It sounds interesting. I have never thought of this idea.
> So I decided to play with this, and the result it the patch below. It
> adds a new knob "recoverable-only" to the slab and page_alloc fault
> attributes. If enabled, then a single fault can be injected if the task
> executing it is in a "recoverable section", this is implemented by some
> new fields in struct task_struct and the (very ugly!) macro
> FAULT_INJECT_CALL_RECOVERABLE_FUNCTION.
I suggest introducing a pair of function like:
void fault_recoverable_enable(unsigned long fault_ids);
void fault_recoverable_disable();
fault_recoverable_enable() sets current task's recoverable state to the
value specified with the argument. fault_recoverable_disable() resets
the recoverable state.
I think this can be more readable than FAULT_INJECT_CALL_RECOVERABLE_FUNCTION
macro. In case of nl80211_remain_on_channel(), you can just put
them in exit and entrance:
fault_recoverable_enable(FAULT_ATTR_SLAB | FAULT_ATTR_PAGE_ALLOC);
...
fault_recoverable_disable();
return err;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists