linux-kernel - [ 27/38] eCryptfs: Copy up POSIX ACL and read-only flags from lower mount

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20121122003907.262728908@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:	Wed, 21 Nov 2012 16:40:10 -0800
From:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk, Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@...onical.com>,
	Stefan Beller <stefanbeller@...glemail.com>,
	John Johansen <john.johansen@...onical.com>,
	Herton Ronaldo Krzesinski <herton.krzesinski@...onical.com>
Subject: [ 27/38] eCryptfs: Copy up POSIX ACL and read-only flags from lower mount

3.0-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@...onical.com>

commit 069ddcda37b2cf5bb4b6031a944c0e9359213262 upstream.

When the eCryptfs mount options do not include '-o acl', but the lower
filesystem's mount options do include 'acl', the MS_POSIXACL flag is not
flipped on in the eCryptfs super block flags. This flag is what the VFS
checks in do_last() when deciding if the current umask should be applied
to a newly created inode's mode or not. When a default POSIX ACL mask is
set on a directory, the current umask is incorrectly applied to new
inodes created in the directory. This patch ignores the MS_POSIXACL flag
passed into ecryptfs_mount() and sets the flag on the eCryptfs super
block depending on the flag's presence on the lower super block.

Additionally, it is incorrect to allow a writeable eCryptfs mount on top
of a read-only lower mount. This missing check did not allow writes to
the read-only lower mount because permissions checks are still performed
on the lower filesystem's objects but it is best to simply not allow a
rw mount on top of ro mount. However, a ro eCryptfs mount on top of a rw
mount is valid and still allowed.

https://launchpad.net/bugs/1009207

Signed-off-by: Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@...onical.com>
Reported-by: Stefan Beller <stefanbeller@...glemail.com>
Cc: John Johansen <john.johansen@...onical.com>
Cc: Herton Ronaldo Krzesinski <herton.krzesinski@...onical.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 fs/ecryptfs/main.c |   10 +++++++++-
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/fs/ecryptfs/main.c
+++ b/fs/ecryptfs/main.c
@@ -505,7 +505,6 @@ static struct dentry *ecryptfs_mount(str
 		goto out;
 	}

-	s->s_flags = flags;
 	rc = bdi_setup_and_register(&sbi->bdi, "ecryptfs", BDI_CAP_MAP_COPY);
 	if (rc)
 		goto out1;
@@ -541,6 +540,15 @@ static struct dentry *ecryptfs_mount(str
 	}

 	ecryptfs_set_superblock_lower(s, path.dentry->d_sb);
+
+	/**
+	 * Set the POSIX ACL flag based on whether they're enabled in the lower
+	 * mount. Force a read-only eCryptfs mount if the lower mount is ro.
+	 * Allow a ro eCryptfs mount even when the lower mount is rw.
+	 */
+	s->s_flags = flags & ~MS_POSIXACL;
+	s->s_flags |= path.dentry->d_sb->s_flags & (MS_RDONLY | MS_POSIXACL);
+
 	s->s_maxbytes = path.dentry->d_sb->s_maxbytes;
 	s->s_blocksize = path.dentry->d_sb->s_blocksize;
 	s->s_magic = ECRYPTFS_SUPER_MAGIC;

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/