[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1353550728.2172.10.camel@rzhang1-mobl4>
Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2012 10:18:48 +0800
From: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>
To: Jonghwan Choi <jhbird.choi@...sung.com>
Cc: 'open list' <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
'Amit Daniel Kachhap' <amit.kachhap@...aro.org>,
'Sachin Kamat' <sachin.kamat@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] thermal: exynos: Fix wrong bit to control tmu
core
On Tue, 2012-11-20 at 09:57 +0900, Jonghwan Choi wrote:
> [0]bit is used to enable/disable tmu core. [1] bit is a reserved bit.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jonghwan Choi <jhbird.choi@...sung.com>
I don't know why but the patch format seems to be a mess.
please resend the patch.
thanks,
rui
> ---
> drivers/thermal/exynos_thermal.c | 16 ++++++++++++----
> 1 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/exynos_thermal.c
> b/drivers/thermal/exynos_thermal.c
> index 6dd29e4..129e827 100644
> --- a/drivers/thermal/exynos_thermal.c
> +++ b/drivers/thermal/exynos_thermal.c
> @@ -52,9 +52,12 @@
>
> #define EXYNOS_TMU_TRIM_TEMP_MASK 0xff
> #define EXYNOS_TMU_GAIN_SHIFT 8
> +#define EXYNOS_TMU_GAIN_MASK (0xF << EXYNOS_TMU_GAIN_SHIFT)
> #define EXYNOS_TMU_REF_VOLTAGE_SHIFT 24
> -#define EXYNOS_TMU_CORE_ON 3
> -#define EXYNOS_TMU_CORE_OFF 2
> +#define EXYNOS_TMU_REF_VOLTAGE_MASK (0x1F <<
> EXYNOS_TMU_REF_VOLTAGE_SHIFT)
> +#define EXYNOS_TMU_CORE_ON BIT(0)
> +#define EXYNOS_TMU_CORE_ON_SHIFT 0
> +#define EXYNOS_TMU_CORE_ON_MASK (0x1 <<
> EXYNOS_TMU_CORE_ON_SHIFT)
> #define EXYNOS_TMU_DEF_CODE_TO_TEMP_OFFSET 50
>
> /* Exynos4210 specific registers */
> @@ -85,7 +88,9 @@
> #define EXYNOS_TMU_CLEAR_FALL_INT (0x111 << 16)
> #define EXYNOS_MUX_ADDR_VALUE 6
> #define EXYNOS_MUX_ADDR_SHIFT 20
> +#define EXYNOS_MUX_ADDR_MASK (0x7 << EXYNOS_MUX_ADDR_SHIFT)
> #define EXYNOS_TMU_TRIP_MODE_SHIFT 13
> +#define EXYNOS_TMU_TRIP_MODE_MASK (0x7 << EXYNOS_TMU_TRIP_MODE_SHIFT)
>
> #define EFUSE_MIN_VALUE 40
> #define EFUSE_MAX_VALUE 100
> @@ -650,10 +655,14 @@ static void exynos_tmu_control(struct platform_device
> *pdev, bool on)
> mutex_lock(&data->lock);
> clk_enable(data->clk);
>
> - con = pdata->reference_voltage << EXYNOS_TMU_REF_VOLTAGE_SHIFT |
> + con = readl(data->base + EXYNOS_TMU_REG_CONTROL);
> + con &= ~(EXYNOS_TMU_REF_VOLTAGE_MASK | EXYNOS_TMU_GAIN_MASK |
> + EXYNOS_TMU_CORE_ON_MASK);
> + con |= pdata->reference_voltage << EXYNOS_TMU_REF_VOLTAGE_SHIFT |
> pdata->gain << EXYNOS_TMU_GAIN_SHIFT;
>
> if (data->soc == SOC_ARCH_EXYNOS) {
> + con &= ~(EXYNOS_TMU_TRIP_MODE_MASK | EXYNOS_MUX_ADDR_MASK);
> con |= pdata->noise_cancel_mode <<
> EXYNOS_TMU_TRIP_MODE_SHIFT;
> con |= (EXYNOS_MUX_ADDR_VALUE << EXYNOS_MUX_ADDR_SHIFT);
> }
> @@ -665,7 +674,6 @@ static void exynos_tmu_control(struct platform_device
> *pdev, bool on)
> pdata->trigger_level1_en << 4 |
> pdata->trigger_level0_en;
> } else {
> - con |= EXYNOS_TMU_CORE_OFF;
> interrupt_en = 0; /* Disable all interrupts */
> }
> writel(interrupt_en, data->base + EXYNOS_TMU_REG_INTEN);
> --
> 1.7.4.1
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists