[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20121122003906.320267044@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 16:40:02 -0800
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk, Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: [ 19/38] net: correct check in dev_addr_del()
3.0-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
[ Upstream commit a652208e0b52c190e57f2a075ffb5e897fe31c3b ]
Check (ha->addr == dev->dev_addr) is always true because dev_addr_init()
sets this. Correct the check to behave properly on addr removal.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
net/core/dev_addr_lists.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/net/core/dev_addr_lists.c
+++ b/net/core/dev_addr_lists.c
@@ -307,7 +307,8 @@ int dev_addr_del(struct net_device *dev,
*/
ha = list_first_entry(&dev->dev_addrs.list,
struct netdev_hw_addr, list);
- if (ha->addr == dev->dev_addr && ha->refcount == 1)
+ if (!memcmp(ha->addr, addr, dev->addr_len) &&
+ ha->type == addr_type && ha->refcount == 1)
return -ENOENT;
err = __hw_addr_del(&dev->dev_addrs, addr, dev->addr_len,
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists