[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87d2z6jigs.fsf@xmission.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 21:48:51 -0800
From: ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 01/12] x86, boot: move verify_cpu.S after 0x200
Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org> writes:
> On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 11:50 AM, H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com> wrote:
>> The comment is just plain wrong. It assumes you're loading an ELF file,
>> whereas in practice that is rarely true.
>>
>> This does explain why the poor ABI, though. A jump table at the
>> beginning would have been a lot cleaner.
>
> Can you please have patch to update the comments and point to the API there ?
Long ago and far away. I wrote the 64bit entry code for a bzImage by
putting an ELF header in the boot sector. That is what that comment
referred to when it was written. Andrew had a problem on one of his
test machines and so the patch to bootsector was dropped.
Booting with a vmlinux file does (or at least should not) need this.
ELF loaders will pick the entry point out from the ELF header.
I don't know what has happened in the intervening time, or who if anyone
has depended on that offset. The original intent an internal use hard
code.
Eric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists