linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/3] CLK: uninline clk_prepare() and clk

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAKohpo=8-rduLZgEyHOtxrJLYfo3F5Op7Z_S8hpLS=nRmMgqmA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 23 Nov 2012 12:57:54 +0530
From:	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To:	Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
Cc:	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	Mike Turquette <mturquette@...com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] CLK: uninline clk_prepare() and clk_unprepare()

On 23 November 2012 12:49, Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com> wrote:
> Ahh, I see. Then I think my first patch was correct albeit it had bad changelog
> message. If provided stubs for clk_prepare()/clk_unprepare() for
> platforms that did not define HAVE_CLK and pushed the check for
> HAVE_CLK_PREPARE down into drivers/clk/clk.c so __clk_prepare() would
> either call platform implementation or just be an empty function.
>
> Am I correct or I am still missing something?

I believe you are still missing it :)

clk.c will only be compiled when we have COMMON_CLK and
COMMON_CLK selects HAVE_CLK_PREPARE.

So, using HAVE_CLK_PREPARE in clk.c is useless, as its always true.
I feel, the best solution would be to simply drop patch 1 and apply others.

--
viresh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/