[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20121123090909.GX8218@suse.de>
Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2012 09:09:09 +0000
From: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
To: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>,
Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@...com>,
Alex Shi <lkml.alex@...il.com>,
Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Aneesh Kumar <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/40] x86: mm: drop TLB flush from ptep_set_access_flags
On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 08:56:37PM +0000, Alan Cox wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Nov 2012 19:25:15 +0000
> Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de> wrote:
>
> > From: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
> >
> > Intel has an architectural guarantee that the TLB entry causing
> > a page fault gets invalidated automatically. This means
> > we should be able to drop the local TLB invalidation.
>
> Can we get an AMD sign off on that ?
>
Hi Alan,
You sortof can[1]. Borislav Petkov answered that they do
https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/11/17/85 and quoted the manual at
https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/10/29/414 saying that this should be ok.
[1] There is no delicate way of putting it. I've no idea what the
current status of current and former AMD kernel developers is.
--
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists