[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1353667868.13542.218.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2012 10:51:08 +0000
From: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@...rix.com>
To: Daniel Kiper <daniel.kiper@...cle.com>
CC: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@...e.com>,
"xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com" <xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com>,
"konrad.wilk@...cle.com" <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
Andrew Cooper <Andrew.Cooper3@...rix.com>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
"kexec@...ts.infradead.org" <kexec@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org"
<virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
"mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 01/11] kexec: introduce kexec_ops struct
On Fri, 2012-11-23 at 10:37 +0000, Daniel Kiper wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 09:53:37AM +0000, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > >>> On 23.11.12 at 02:56, Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@...rix.com> wrote:
> > > The crash region (as specified by crashkernel= on the Xen command line)
> > > is isolated from dom0.
> > >[...]
> >
> > But all of this _could_ be done completely independent of the
> > Dom0 kernel's kexec infrastructure (i.e. fully from user space,
> > invoking the necessary hypercalls through the privcmd driver).
>
> No, this is impossible. kexec/kdump image lives in dom0 kernel memory
> until execution.
Are you sure? I could have sworn they lived in the hypervisor owned
memory set aside by the crashkernel= parameter as Andy suggested.
Ian.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists