[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1717408.oqDbQt79dV@vostro.rjw.lan>
Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2012 12:39:40 +0100
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To: Jean Delvare <khali@...ux-fr.org>
Cc: grant.likely@...retlab.ca, linus.walleij@...aro.org,
w.sang@...gutronix.de,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
lenb@...nel.org, broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com,
ben-linux@...ff.org, bhelgaas@...gle.com,
mathias.nyman@...ux.intel.com, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] ACPI 5 support for GPIO, SPI and I2C
On Wednesday, November 21, 2012 10:54:50 PM Jean Delvare wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Nov 2012 22:31:15 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > Mathias Nyman (1):
> > > gpio / ACPI: add ACPI support
> > >
> > > Mika Westerberg (2):
> > > spi / ACPI: add ACPI enumeration support
> > > i2c / ACPI: add ACPI enumeration support
> >
> > This patchset has been around for quite a while and went through a few
> > iterations, so I think it's as good as it gets at this point.
> >
> > I wonder if the GPIO / SPI / I2C maintainers have any objections against it or
> > would like the patches to be modified somehow?
>
> I'd say go ahead, any issue that shows up can be fixed afterward.
>
> > If not, then I'd like to take it for v3.8 into the linux-pm.git tree, because
> > the patches depend on some changes already in that tree. Hopefully, that's OK.
>
> Yes.
Cool, thanks! :-)
I took the i2c patch for linux-next (targeting v3.8) and I'm waiting with
the GPIO and SPI patches for a word from Grant.
Thanks,
Rafael
--
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists