linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 01/31] iov_iter: move into its own file

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 23 Nov 2012 11:34:15 -0600
From:	Dave Kleikamp <dave.kleikamp@...cle.com>
To:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
CC:	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Zach Brown <zab@...bo.net>,
	"Maxim V. Patlasov" <mpatlasov@...allels.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 01/31] iov_iter: move into its own file

On 11/23/2012 02:14 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 04:40:41PM -0600, Dave Kleikamp wrote:
>> From: Zach Brown <zab@...bo.net>
>>
>> This moves the iov_iter functions in to their own file.  We're going to
>> be working on them in upcoming patches.  They become sufficiently large,
>> and remain self-contained, to justify seperating them from the rest of
>> the huge mm/filemap.c.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Dave Kleikamp <dave.kleikamp@...cle.com>
>> Acked-by: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@...hat.com>
>> Cc: Zach Brown <zab@...bo.net>
> 
> Is this mm or fs code?  I'd be tempted to have the file in fs/.

I have no objection. If nobody else objects, I'll move it there instead.

Shaggy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/