[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <50B104BC.90208@zytor.com>
Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2012 09:32:44 -0800
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
CC: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>,
Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 11/12] x86, boot: add fields to support load bzImage
and ramdisk high
On 11/24/2012 04:37 AM, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>
> Certainly /sbin/kexec isn't bothering to calculate the end of the setup
> header and just being far more conservative and using all of the 16bit
> real mode code as it's initializer.
>
That's not conservative... that's just plain wrong. It means you're
initializing the fields in struct boot_params with garbage instead of a
predictable value (zero).
We could work around it with a sentinel hack... except you *also*
probably modify *some* fields and now we have a horrid mix of
initialized and uninitialized fields to sort out... and there really
isn't any sane way for the kernel to sort that out.
We have a huge problem on our hands now because of it.
-hpa
--
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists