linux-kernel - [PATCH 3/4] uprobes: Kill UPROBE_RUN

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20121124180233.GA30990@redhat.com>
Date:	Sat, 24 Nov 2012 19:02:33 +0100
From:	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc:	Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@...ibm.com>,
	Anton Arapov <anton@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 3/4] uprobes: Kill UPROBE_RUN_HANDLER flag

Simply remove UPROBE_RUN_HANDLER and the corresponding code.

It can only help if uprobe has a single consumer, and in fact
it is no longer needed after handler_chain() was changed to use
->register_rwsem, we simply can not race with uprobe_register().

Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
---
 kernel/events/uprobes.c |   23 +++++------------------
 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/events/uprobes.c b/kernel/events/uprobes.c
index 873c993..97c3874 100644
--- a/kernel/events/uprobes.c
+++ b/kernel/events/uprobes.c
@@ -83,10 +83,8 @@ static atomic_t uprobe_events = ATOMIC_INIT(0);
 
 /* Have a copy of original instruction */
 #define UPROBE_COPY_INSN	0
-/* Dont run handlers when first register/ last unregister in progress*/
-#define UPROBE_RUN_HANDLER	1
 /* Can skip singlestep */
-#define UPROBE_SKIP_SSTEP	2
+#define UPROBE_SKIP_SSTEP	1
 
 struct uprobe {
 	struct rb_node		rb_node;	/* node in the rb tree */
@@ -475,9 +473,6 @@ static void handler_chain(struct uprobe *uprobe, struct pt_regs *regs)
 {
 	struct uprobe_consumer *uc;
 
-	if (!test_bit(UPROBE_RUN_HANDLER, &uprobe->flags))
-		return;
-
 	down_read(&uprobe->register_rwsem);
 	for (uc = uprobe->consumers; uc; uc = uc->next)
 		uc->handler(uc, regs);
@@ -825,13 +820,8 @@ static int register_for_each_vma(struct uprobe *uprobe, bool is_register)
 
 static int __uprobe_register(struct uprobe *uprobe, struct uprobe_consumer *uc)
 {
-	int err;
-
 	consumer_add(uprobe, uc);
-	err = register_for_each_vma(uprobe, true);
-	if (!err) /* TODO: pointless unless the first consumer */
-		set_bit(UPROBE_RUN_HANDLER, &uprobe->flags);
-	return err;
+	return register_for_each_vma(uprobe, true);
 }
 
 static void __uprobe_unregister(struct uprobe *uprobe, struct uprobe_consumer *uc)
@@ -842,12 +832,9 @@ static void __uprobe_unregister(struct uprobe *uprobe, struct uprobe_consumer *u
 		return;
 
 	err = register_for_each_vma(uprobe, false);
-	if (!uprobe->consumers) {
-		clear_bit(UPROBE_RUN_HANDLER, &uprobe->flags);
-		/* TODO : cant unregister? schedule a worker thread */
-		if (!err)
-			delete_uprobe(uprobe);
-	}
+	/* TODO : cant unregister? schedule a worker thread */
+	if (!uprobe->consumers && !err)
+		delete_uprobe(uprobe);
 }
 
 /*
-- 
1.5.5.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/