[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20121124180231.GA30983@redhat.com>
Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2012 19:02:31 +0100
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@...ibm.com>,
Anton Arapov <anton@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/4] uprobes: Change filter_chain() to iterate ->consumers
list
Now that it safe to use ->consumer_rwsem under ->mmap_sem we can
almost finish the implementation of filter_chain(). It still lacks
the actual uc->filter(...) call but othewrwise it is ready, just
it pretends that ->filter() always returns true.
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
---
kernel/events/uprobes.c | 21 +++++++++++++--------
1 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/events/uprobes.c b/kernel/events/uprobes.c
index 03ffbb5..873c993 100644
--- a/kernel/events/uprobes.c
+++ b/kernel/events/uprobes.c
@@ -614,14 +614,19 @@ static int prepare_uprobe(struct uprobe *uprobe, struct file *file,
static bool filter_chain(struct uprobe *uprobe)
{
- /*
- * TODO:
- * for_each_consumer(uc)
- * if (uc->filter(...))
- * return true;
- * return false;
- */
- return uprobe->consumers != NULL;
+ struct uprobe_consumer *uc;
+ bool ret = false;
+
+ down_read(&uprobe->consumer_rwsem);
+ for (uc = uprobe->consumers; uc; uc = uc->next) {
+ /* TODO: ret = uc->filter(...) */
+ ret = true;
+ if (ret)
+ break;
+ }
+ up_read(&uprobe->consumer_rwsem);
+
+ return ret;
}
static int
--
1.5.5.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists