[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2676657.zDjyfqIDdm@vostro.rjw.lan>
Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2012 11:03:30 +0100
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: Rob Herring <robherring2@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpuidle: add Calxeda SOC idle support
On Monday, November 12, 2012 10:00:07 PM Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wednesday 07 November 2012, Rob Herring wrote:
> > From: Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>
> >
> > Add support for core powergating on Calxeda platforms. Initially, this
> > supports ECX-1000 (highbank), but support will be added for ECX-2000
> > later.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>
> > Cc: Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>
> > Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
>
> Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
>
> > It's not really clear where we want ARM cpuidle drivers. We're moving
> > everything else out of arch/arm, and my understanding is Len doesn't want
> > them in drivers/idle. It seems kind of silly to me to have the framework
> > and drivers in 2 places. I've put this in drivers/cpuidle, but it doesn't
> > make any difference to me.
>
> Fine with me. I just don't want in in arch/arm because I'm guessing this will
> be shared with arm64, which in turn shares idle (and other) drivers with various
> powerpc, mips and x86 socs.
Applied to linux-pm.git/linux-next as v3.8 material.
Thanks,
Rafael
--
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists