[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <50B160FD.6050004@zytor.com>
Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2012 16:06:21 -0800
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
CC: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>,
Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 11/12] x86, boot: add fields to support load bzImage
and ramdisk high
On 11/24/2012 04:04 PM, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 24, 2012 at 3:50 PM, Eric W. Biederman
> <ebiederm@...ssion.com> wrote:
>>
>> I believe all added variables between the last version of the boot
>> protocol /sbin/kexec knows about and the current time were added in the
>> initialized data section. Certainly we can check and that will tell us
>> how likely changes in arch/x86/boot/ have been regressions in the 32bit
>> entry point support.
>>
>> As for solving this there is a simple solution. Add a second jump
>> right after the first jump. The variables after the second jump can
>> all be zero initialized.
>
> could use .org to force start_of_setup start from 0x1000
>
> but how about area before setup_header ? how it is full of EFI_STUB suff there.
>
Yes, it doesn't really solve the problem I fear.
-hpa
--
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists