linux-kernel - [PATCH 2/3] uprobes: Introduce uprobe_is

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20121125223347.GA24808@redhat.com>
Date:	Sun, 25 Nov 2012 23:33:47 +0100
From:	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc:	Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@...ibm.com>,
	Anton Arapov <anton@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/3] uprobes: Introduce uprobe_is_active()

The lifetime of uprobe->rb_node and uprobe->inode is not refcounted,
delete_uprobe() is called when we detect that uprobe has no consumers,
and it would be deadly wrong to do this twice.

Change delete_uprobe() to WARN() if it was already called. We use
RB_CLEAR_NODE() to mark uprobe "inactive", then RB_EMPTY_NODE() can
be used to detect this case.

RB_EMPTY_NODE() is not used directly, we add the trivial helper for
the next change.

Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
---
 kernel/events/uprobes.c |    8 ++++++++
 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/events/uprobes.c b/kernel/events/uprobes.c
index 53dc2eb..2886c82 100644
--- a/kernel/events/uprobes.c
+++ b/kernel/events/uprobes.c
@@ -669,6 +669,10 @@ remove_breakpoint(struct uprobe *uprobe, struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long vad
 	return set_orig_insn(&uprobe->arch, mm, vaddr);
 }
 
+static inline bool uprobe_is_active(struct uprobe *uprobe)
+{
+	return !RB_EMPTY_NODE(&uprobe->rb_node);
+}
 /*
  * There could be threads that have already hit the breakpoint. They
  * will recheck the current insn and restart if find_uprobe() fails.
@@ -676,9 +680,13 @@ remove_breakpoint(struct uprobe *uprobe, struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long vad
  */
 static void delete_uprobe(struct uprobe *uprobe)
 {
+	if (WARN_ON(!uprobe_is_active(uprobe)))
+		return;
+
 	spin_lock(&uprobes_treelock);
 	rb_erase(&uprobe->rb_node, &uprobes_tree);
 	spin_unlock(&uprobes_treelock);
+	RB_CLEAR_NODE(&uprobe->rb_node); /* for uprobe_is_active() */
 	iput(uprobe->inode);
 	put_uprobe(uprobe);
 }
-- 
1.5.5.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/