[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20121126112823.GI12782@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2012 11:28:23 +0000
From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To: Shiraz Hashim <shiraz.hashim@...com>, linus.walleij@...aro.org
Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>, linus.walleij@...aro.org,
grant.likely@...retlab.ca, devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, spear-devel@...t.st.com,
Vipul Kumar Samar <vipulkumar.samar@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpio: stmpe: Add DT support for stmpe gpio
On Fri, 23 Nov 2012, Shiraz Hashim wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 12:14:13PM +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
> > > >> + if (np)
> > > >> + of_property_read_u32(np, "st,norequest-mask",
> > > >> + &pdata->norequest_mask);
> > > >
> > > > Can you explain to me what this does?
> > >
> > > You mean pdata->norequest_mask? It marks few gpios as unusable.
> > > Because these pads might be used by other blocks of stmpe.
> >
> > I'm not sure if that should be set with DT or not.
> >
> > Second opinion anyone?
>
> This is a board dependent parameter which just informs gpio driver
> about pins, which must not be requested. It may happen for a stmpe
> variant where such gpio pins are multiplexed with some other
> function.
>
> Hence it must be part of DT itself.
Doesn't pinctrl normally handle this kind of stuff?
--
Lee Jones
Linaro ST-Ericsson Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists