[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <50B35A4D.8080501@compulab.co.il>
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2012 14:02:21 +0200
From: Igor Grinberg <grinberg@...pulab.co.il>
To: Alessio Igor Bogani <alessio.bogani@...ttra.trieste.it>
CC: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: OMAP: Conditionally compile counter_32k
On 11/26/12 11:28, Alessio Igor Bogani wrote:
> The 32K timer isn't available on all OMAP devices.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alessio Igor Bogani <alessio.bogani@...ttra.trieste.it>
> ---
> arch/arm/plat-omap/Makefile | 4 +++-
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-omap/Makefile b/arch/arm/plat-omap/Makefile
> index 8d88584..b1b321c 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/plat-omap/Makefile
> +++ b/arch/arm/plat-omap/Makefile
> @@ -3,11 +3,13 @@
> #
>
> # Common support
> -obj-y := sram.o dma.o fb.o counter_32k.o
> +obj-y := sram.o dma.o fb.o
> obj-m :=
> obj-n :=
> obj- :=
>
> +obj-$(CONFIG_OMAP_32K_TIMER) += counter_32k.o
We are moving away from this config option in favor of runtime detection,
so I don't think this patch is appropriate.
Why do you need this?
> +
> # omap_device support (OMAP2+ only at the moment)
>
> obj-$(CONFIG_OMAP_DM_TIMER) += dmtimer.o
--
Regards,
Igor.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists