[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20121126141843.GE10312@moon>
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2012 18:18:43 +0400
From: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...nvz.org>
To: Amnon Shiloh <u3557@...o.sublimeip.com>
Cc: Andrey Wagin <avagin@...il.com>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...allels.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: vdso && cr (Was: arch_check_bp_in_kernelspace: fix the range
check)
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 11:55:01PM +1100, Amnon Shiloh wrote:
>
> You could of course keep that old code and modify only the very
> first instruction of each routine into a jump instruction, but then
> the code to which the process returns may not be compatible with
> the new kernel and/or hardware configuration.
For sure there will be some limitations but I fear we can't do
that much with it. I don't expect the regular program to use
sigreturn for jumping into vdso code, but I could be wrong.
Cyrill
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists