[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20121126144155.GA16404@moon>
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2012 18:41:55 +0400
From: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...nvz.org>
To: Amnon Shiloh <u3557@...o.sublimeip.com>
Cc: Andrey Wagin <avagin@...il.com>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...allels.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: vdso && cr
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 01:26:55AM +1100, Amnon Shiloh wrote:
> Programmers don't (and the manual-page says they shouldn't even try)
> call "sigreturn" directly.
>
> If an interrupt happens, by bad luck, to occur while the process
> is running vdso code, then eventually, once signal-processing is
> complete, "sigreturn" (issued by glibc) will take the process back
> to where it was before the interrupt happend, inside the vdso page.
Hi Amnon, good point, need to think. Frankly I would like to escape
kernel patching as long as possible ;)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists