[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20121126144354.GI31891@thunk.org>
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2012 09:43:54 -0500
From: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
To: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH, 3.7-rc7, RESEND] fs: revert commit bbdd6808 to fallocate
UAPI
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 11:53:45AM +0000, Alan Cox wrote:
> > It's not like there is any shortage of flag bits, so what's the harm
> > of reserving the bit?
>
> Why not just reserve a small group of bits for fs private use in that
> case - for any fs.
I think that would be a *fine* idea.
- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists