lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKohponTxs983vVQV=6Q8zyesC1W1FhFkzfmpAVeEwU-cQXohA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 26 Nov 2012 20:30:56 +0530
From:	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To:	pjt@...gle.com, paul.mckenney@...aro.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
	tj@...nel.org, suresh.b.siddha@...el.com, venki@...gle.com,
	mingo@...hat.com, peterz@...radead.org, rostedt@...dmis.org
Cc:	Arvind.Chauhan@....com, linaro-dev@...ts.linaro.org,
	patches@...aro.org, pdsw-power-team@....com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org,
	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 Resend 0/4] Create sched_select_cpu() and use it for
 workqueues and timers

On 6 November 2012 16:08, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org> wrote:
> This is V2 Resend of my sched_select_cpu() work. Resend because didn't got much
> attention on V2. Including more guys now in cc :)
>
> In order to save power, it would be useful to schedule work onto non-IDLE cpus
> instead of waking up an IDLE one.
>
> To achieve this, we need scheduler to guide kernel frameworks (like: timers &
> workqueues) on which is the most preferred CPU that must be used for these
> tasks.
>
> This patchset is about implementing this concept.
>
> - The first patch adds sched_select_cpu() routine which returns the preferred
>   cpu which is non-idle.
> - Second patch removes idle_cpu() calls from timer & hrtimer.
> - Third patch is about adapting this change in workqueue framework.
> - Fourth patch add migration capability in running timer
>
> Earlier discussions over v1 can be found here:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org/msg13342.html
>
> Earlier discussions over this concept were done at last LPC:
> http://summit.linuxplumbersconf.org/lpc-2012/meeting/90/lpc2012-sched-timer-workqueue/
>
> Module created for testing this behavior is present here:
> http://git.linaro.org/gitweb?p=people/vireshk/module.git;a=summary

Ping!!

--
viresh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ