[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1353949160-26803-139-git-send-email-herton.krzesinski@canonical.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2012 14:57:08 -0200
From: Herton Ronaldo Krzesinski <herton.krzesinski@...onical.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-team@...ts.ubuntu.com
Cc: Sage Weil <sage@...tank.com>,
Herton Ronaldo Krzesinski <herton.krzesinski@...onical.com>
Subject: [PATCH 138/270] libceph: verify state after retaking con lock after dispatch
3.5.7u1 -stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Sage Weil <sage@...tank.com>
commit 7b862e07b1a4d5c963d19027f10ea78085f27f9b upstream.
We drop the con mutex when delivering a message. When we retake the
lock, we need to verify we are still in the OPEN state before
preparing to read the next tag, or else we risk stepping on a
connection that has been closed.
Signed-off-by: Sage Weil <sage@...tank.com>
Reviewed-by: Alex Elder <elder@...tank.com>
Signed-off-by: Herton Ronaldo Krzesinski <herton.krzesinski@...onical.com>
---
net/ceph/messenger.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/ceph/messenger.c b/net/ceph/messenger.c
index a6a0c7a..feb5a2a 100644
--- a/net/ceph/messenger.c
+++ b/net/ceph/messenger.c
@@ -2003,7 +2003,6 @@ static void process_message(struct ceph_connection *con)
con->ops->dispatch(con, msg);
mutex_lock(&con->mutex);
- prepare_read_tag(con);
}
@@ -2213,6 +2212,8 @@ more:
if (con->in_tag == CEPH_MSGR_TAG_READY)
goto more;
process_message(con);
+ if (con->state == CON_STATE_OPEN)
+ prepare_read_tag(con);
goto more;
}
if (con->in_tag == CEPH_MSGR_TAG_ACK) {
--
1.7.9.5
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists