[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20121126093728.0a10f97f@nehalam.linuxnetplumber.net>
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2012 09:37:28 -0800
From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>
To: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
Cc: rusty@...tcorp.com.au, mst@...hat.com, davem@...emloft.net,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [net-next RFC] pktgen: don't wait for the device who doesn't
free skb immediately after sent
On Mon, 26 Nov 2012 15:56:52 +0800
Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com> wrote:
> Some deivces do not free the old tx skbs immediately after it has been sent
> (usually in tx interrupt). One such example is virtio-net which optimizes for
> virt and only free the possible old tx skbs during the next packet sending. This
> would lead the pktgen to wait forever in the refcount of the skb if no other
> pakcet will be sent afterwards.
>
> Solving this issue by introducing a new flag IFF_TX_SKB_FREE_DELAY which could
> notify the pktgen that the device does not free skb immediately after it has
> been sent and let it not to wait for the refcount to be one.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
Another alternative would be using skb_orphan() and skb->destructor.
There are other cases where skb's are not freed right away.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists