[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20121126223249.GB15930@mtj.dyndns.org>
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2012 14:32:49 -0800
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: oleg@...hat.com
Cc: peterz@...radead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Paul Menage <paul@...lmenage.org>,
containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org, cgroups@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Why is cpuset_cpus_allowed_fallback() necessary?
Hello, guys.
I'm wondering why cpuset_cpus_allowed_fallback() is necessary. This
is called from, e.g., try_to_wake_up()->select_task_rq() when none of
the cpus in ->cpus_allowed is useable. The cpuset callback invokes
do_set_cpus_allowed() w/ the cpuset's cpus_allowed. This was added by
the following commit,
commit 9084bb8246ea935b98320554229e2f371f7f52fa
Author: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Date: Mon Mar 15 10:10:27 2010 +0100
sched: Make select_fallback_rq() cpuset friendly
Introduce cpuset_cpus_allowed_fallback() helper to fix the cpuset problems
with select_fallback_rq(). It can be called from any context and can't use
any cpuset locks including task_lock(). It is called when the task doesn't
have online cpus in ->cpus_allowed but ttwu/etc must be able to find a
suitable cpu.
....
The problem is, nothing's explaining what "the cpuset problems with
select_fallback_rq()" are. Oleg, do you remember? Why do we need
this?
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists