[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <50B3FAAB.9090406@samsung.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2012 08:26:35 +0900
From: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@...sung.com>,
patches@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] extcon: arizona: Only set GPIO if it has been requested
On 11/26/2012 08:28 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> The micd_pol GPIO is only requested if we've specified one greater than 0
> so apply the same test before we set it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
> ---
> drivers/extcon/extcon-arizona.c | 5 +++--
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/extcon/extcon-arizona.c b/drivers/extcon/extcon-arizona.c
> index cdab9e5..585882e 100644
> --- a/drivers/extcon/extcon-arizona.c
> +++ b/drivers/extcon/extcon-arizona.c
> @@ -85,8 +85,9 @@ static void arizona_extcon_set_mode(struct arizona_extcon_info *info, int mode)
> {
> struct arizona *arizona = info->arizona;
>
> - gpio_set_value_cansleep(arizona->pdata.micd_pol_gpio,
> - info->micd_modes[mode].gpio);
> + if (arizona->pdata.micd_pol_gpio > 0)
> + gpio_set_value_cansleep(arizona->pdata.micd_pol_gpio,
> + info->micd_modes[mode].gpio);
Why not use gpio_is_valid() function to test arizona->pdata.micd_pol_gpio ?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists