[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20121127003239.GA32298@kroah.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2012 16:32:39 -0800
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
Cc: George Zhang <georgezhang@...are.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, pv-drivers@...are.com,
acking@...are.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/12] VMCI: Some header and config files.
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 04:23:57PM -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> Hi Greg,
>
> For some reason it still didn't go through to our corporate mail server
> but I see it on LKML.
Good.
> On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 04:03:04PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 07, 2012 at 10:43:03AM -0800, George Zhang wrote:
> >
> > > +static inline struct vmci_handle VMCI_MAKE_HANDLE(vmci_id cid, vmci_id rid)
> > > +{
> > > + struct vmci_handle h;
> > > + h.context = cid;
> > > + h.resource = rid;
> > > + return h;
> > > +}
> >
> > You return a structure on the stack that just went away? Yeah, I know
> > it's an inline, but come on, that's not ok.
>
> This is certainly OK even if it is not inline, we return the _value_,
> not the pointer to the stacki memory. And yes, the structure is 64 bit
> value so it is returned in registers.
Even on a 32bit processor? Also, you already have another function that
does this same thing, so having 2 functions in the same patch seems odd,
right?
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists