linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] mm: compaction: Fix return value of capture_free

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20121127110746.GN8218@suse.de>
Date:	Tue, 27 Nov 2012 11:07:47 +0000
From:	Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
To:	Dave Hansen <dave@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc:	akpm@...l.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: compaction: Fix return value of capture_free_page

On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 07:06:53AM -0800, Dave Hansen wrote:
> On 11/26/2012 03:23 AM, Mel Gorman wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 02:21:51PM -0500, Dave Hansen wrote:
> >>
> >> This needs to make it in before 3.7 is released.
> >>
> > 
> > This is also required. Dave, can you double check? The surprise is that
> > this does not blow up very obviously.
> ...
> > @@ -1422,7 +1422,7 @@ int capture_free_page(struct page *page, int alloc_order, int migratetype)
> >  		}
> >  	}
> > 
> > -	return 1UL << order;
> > +	return 1UL << alloc_order;
> >  }
> 
> compact_capture_page() only looks at the boolean return value out of
> capture_free_page(), so it wouldn't notice.  split_free_page() does.
> But, when it calls capture_free_page(), order==alloc_order, so it
> wouldn't make a difference.  So, there's probably no actual bug here,
> but it's certainly a wrong return value.
> 

I don't think it is fine in this case.

isolate_freepages_block
isolated = split_free_page(page);
  -> split_free_page
     nr_pages = capture_free_page(page, order, 0);
     -> capture_free_page (returns wrong value of too many pages)
     return nr_pages;

so now isolate_freepages_block has the wrong value with nr_pages holding
a value for a larger number of pages than are really isolated and does
this

                for (i = 0; i < isolated; i++) {
                        list_add(&page->lru, freelist);
                        page++;
                }

so potentially that is now adding pages that are already on the buddy list
to the local free list and "fun" ensues.

-- 
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/