linux-kernel - Re: Re: [GIT PULL] extcon for Linux 3.8

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-id: <292179.45651353977670193.JavaMail.weblogic@epv6ml08>
Date:	Tue, 27 Nov 2012 00:54:30 +0000 (GMT)
From:	MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@...sung.com>
To:	Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"myungjoo.ham@...il.com" <myungjoo.ham@...il.com>,
	최찬우 <cw00.choi@...sung.com>,
	박경민 <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>,
	"sachin.kamat@...aro.org" <sachin.kamat@...aro.org>,
	"khoroshilov@...ras.ru" <khoroshilov@...ras.ru>
Subject: Re: Re: [GIT PULL] extcon for Linux 3.8

> On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 01:51:10PM +0900, MyungJoo Ham wrote:
> > Please pull extcon patches for Linux 3.8.
> 
> This is not a signed-tag pull request, which I thought I asked for
> previously.
> 
> Please create that, so that I can properly know I am getting the right
> pull request and patches.

A singed tag, "pull_req_20121122", has been already attached at the HEAD
of for-next branch.

Would it be more readable if the request is made with
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mzx/extcon.git tags/pull_req_20121122
rather than
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mzx/extcon.git for-next
? (both point to the same commit and I tried the first URL for git request-pull; however git request-pull gives me the second URL as the result)

Cheers,
MyungJoo

> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h
> 
> 
> 
>        
>   
>          
>