linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/2] ima: policy search speedup

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CALLzPKZKd38QJVPfjdNpAFO9hwmRc1asVGkHby1VGRLm89DKyg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 27 Nov 2012 15:42:13 +0200
From:	"Kasatkin, Dmitry" <dmitry.kasatkin@...el.com>
To:	viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, zohar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] ima: policy search speedup

Hello,

Any thoughts about this proposal?

- Dmitry

On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 11:54 PM, Dmitry Kasatkin
<dmitry.kasatkin@...el.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Here is two patches for policy search speedup.
>
> First patch adds additional features flags to superblock.
> Second - implementation for IMA.
>
> Two months ago I was asking about it on mailing lists.
> Suggestion was not to use s_flags, but e.g. s_feature_flags.
>
> Any objections about such approach?
>
> Thanks,
> Dmitry
>
> Dmitry Kasatkin (2):
>   vfs: new super block feature flags attribute
>   ima: skip policy search for never appraised or measured files
>
>  include/linux/fs.h                  |    4 ++++
>  security/integrity/ima/ima_api.c    |    8 ++------
>  security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c |   20 +++++++++++++++++---
>  security/integrity/integrity.h      |    3 +++
>  4 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 1.7.10.4
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/