linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/3] Input: bu21013_ts - Request a regulator that actually exists

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20121127143407.GG2013@gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 27 Nov 2012 14:34:07 +0000
From:	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Cc:	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
	linus.walleij@...ricsson.com, arnd@...db.de,
	linux-input@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] Input: bu21013_ts - Request a regulator that
 actually exists

On Tue, 27 Nov 2012, Mark Brown wrote:

> On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 01:13:08PM +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
> > Currently the BU21013 Touch Screen driver requests a regulator by the
> > name of 'V-TOUCH', which doesn't exist anywhere in the kernel. The
> > correct name, as referenced in platform regulator code is 'avdd'. Here,
> > when we request a regulator, we use the correct name instead.
> 
> The regulator should be requested using whatever the name for the supply
> in the datasheet - AVDD does sound very pluasible but it'd be good to
> check.

Right. 'avdd' is correct.

-- 
Lee Jones
Linaro ST-Ericsson Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/