lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 27 Nov 2012 10:04:12 -0500
From:	Mark Hounschell <markh@...pro.net>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
CC:	Mark Hounschell <dmarkh@....rr.com>
Subject: Wireless network problem with Access Point selection using ifup

I have a wireless-N Linksys router centrally located in my home. I also 
have 2 each Linksys E1000 range extenders located at each end of the 
house. I have Desktop computers in fixed locations around the house. 
Using Network Manager all is well with all of them. I can see all the 
Access Points and select the one with the best signal. However network 
manager doesn't seem to be a valid option for all of them and I'm using 
traditional IFUP with static configurations.

When using IFUP, wrong Access Points are being chosen by whatever the 
underlying userland/kernel process is that is supposed to select it. It 
seems it wants to select the one with the weakest signal instead of the 
strongest.  I'm being told that when using ifup and WPA, as opposed to 
WEP, that userland has no choice in the selection of an Access Point by 
MAC address, only by SSID. All my APs have the same SSID.

I am using SuSE 12.2 Linux and 3.6.6 kernels on all these machines and 
the wireless hardware I am using on all these is are ASUS USB-300N adapters.

lsusb output: Bus 001 Device 004: ID 0b05:17ab ASUSTek Computer, Inc.

The kernel driver being used is rtl8192cu.


I don't understand why the developers of whatever the underlying 
userland/kernel process is that selects the AP, did not think that a 
user selection option by MAC address might be a good idea, as I'm told 
it is possible using WEP.  In any case, I am unable to get all this 
stuff working properly. Most of the time, the AP furthest away is 
selected. Often the router in the middle of the house is selected. Very 
very rarely is the closest AP chosen. When the furthest is chosen, I am 
unable to use the network. When the router in the middle of the home is 
selected, the connection comes to a crawl and often disassociates in the 
middle of use. When it does choose the correct AP, all is well until I 
reboot the machine.

The same thing happens with the desktop machine at the other end of the 
house but most of the time it selects the router in the middle of the 
house. It has never selected the closest AP.

Some sample dmesg and iwconfig output when the AP at the other end of 
the house was selected:


[   19.876977] wlan0: authenticate with c8:d7:19:7a:ab:1e
[   19.901616] wlan0: send auth to c8:d7:19:7a:ab:1e (try 1/3)
[   19.904099] wlan0: authenticated
[   19.916679] wlan0: associate with c8:d7:19:7a:ab:1e (try 1/3)
[   19.925839] wlan0: RX AssocResp from c8:d7:19:7a:ab:1e (capab=0x411 
status=0 aid=2)
[   19.925975] wlan0: associated
[   19.925988] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): wlan0: link becomes ready



wlan0     IEEE 802.11bgn  ESSID:"hounschell-1"
               Mode:Managed  Frequency:2.437 GHz  Access Point: 
C8:D7:19:7A:AB:1E
               Bit Rate=150 Mb/s   Tx-Power=20 dBm
               Retry  long limit:7   RTS thr=2347 B   Fragment thr:off
               Encryption key:off
               Power Management:off
               Link Quality=66/70  Signal level=-44 dBm
               Rx invalid nwid:0  Rx invalid crypt:0  Rx invalid frag:0
               Tx excessive retries:0  Invalid misc:9   Missed beacon:0

This AP is at the other end of the house. The network was unusable after 
this boot.

Is this likely a kernel issue? If so, I would be willing to help with it 
if I can with my configuration.

Regards
Mark





--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ