linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4/6 v5] arm highbank: add support for pl320 IPC

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20121127171250.3984e990@skate>
Date:	Tue, 27 Nov 2012 17:12:50 +0100
From:	Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com>
To:	Mark Langsdorf <mark.langsdorf@...xeda.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, cpufreq@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	Omar Ramirez Luna <omar.luna@...aro.org>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6 v5] arm highbank: add support for pl320 IPC

Dear Mark Langsdorf,

On Tue, 27 Nov 2012 09:04:32 -0600, Mark Langsdorf wrote:

> +int ipc_transmit(u32 *data);

ipc_transmit() looks to me like a way to generic name to be exposed to
the entire kernel.

> +extern int pl320_ipc_register_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb);
> +extern int pl320_ipc_unregister_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb);

Why some "extern" here? You don't have these for the other functions in
this header file.

Thomas
-- 
Thomas Petazzoni, Free Electrons
Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux
development, consulting, training and support.
http://free-electrons.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/