[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20121127161925.GG2474@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2012 08:19:25 -0800
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Cc: Gleb Natapov <gleb@...hat.com>,
Li Zhong <zhong@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-next list <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, sasha.levin@...cle.com,
avi@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] Fix abnormal rcu dynticks_nesting values related to
async page fault
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 04:56:30PM +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> 2012/11/27 Gleb Natapov <gleb@...hat.com>:
> > For KVM_PV_REASON_PAGE_NOT_PRESENT it behaves like an exception.
>
> Ok.
> There seem to be a bug in kvm_async_pf_task_wait(). Using
> idle_cpu(cpu) to find out if the current task is the idle task may not
> work if there is pending wake up. Me may schedule another task but
> when that other task sleeps later we can't schedule back to idle until
> the fault is completed.
>
> The right way is to use is_idle_task(current)
Agreed. But if you instead need to figure out whether or not RCU believes
that the CPU is idle, use rcu_is_cpu_idle(). You need to figure out
whether or not RCU believes that the CPU is idle if you are trying to
play fast and loose with rcu_irq_enter() and rcu_irq_exit().
Thanx, Paul
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists